I'm not sure what your saying here, but the evidence of 'HIV incidence' and malnutrition and general toxicity is very strong.
Sure thing - here is a link about the Soviet Unions first case of HIV - a man named Nikolay Panchenko who has been alive for 22 years, the last 13 of which he stopped taking his meds, he's never felt better apparently, though he too is making a living off of AIDS now, it's too tempting not to for the medication refusers I suppose
english.pravda.ru/main/18/87/347/16561_Panchenko.htmlThis was the first of a trickle of 'cases' in 1987. Fast forward to 2009 and Russia has among the highest rates of 'HIV - AIDS' outside of Africa.
The incidence of 'HIV' in Russia jumped 70% in 2001 alone, this info is from the WHO:
74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:J06EcfgFhqIJ:www.scielo.br/pdf/bwho/v79n1/v79n1a17.pdf+soviet+union+aids+numbers&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=ca&client=firefox-aIn fact the rate of HIV has grown exponentially in Russia since its economic implosion. Consequently as the testing for 'antibodies' which signal 'HIV' has increased so too have the number of infected.
I'd likely kick you back, though I might turn the other cheek depending on the circumstances.
It seems you take exception to the fast and loose lifestyle? These words are actually from the horses mouth so to speak. Watch the documentary 'The Other Side of AIDS' for more background.
Are you familiar with gay districts? I live near Toronto, one of the gay capitals of the world, and believe me no one has sex like a young gay male. Studies that quantify the average numbers of 'partners' a gay male has each year range from (on average) no less than 20 to 100. The mean I believe was 48. You can find the study if your that interested, there are many of them that all have differing numbers but none less than 20 partners a year on average. If that's not loose I don't know what is.
Here's a fairly recent piece on HIV in the gay community - its off the charts (did they insert a gay gene marker into their retrovirus!?).
www.chicagofreepress.com/node/860And yes of course there are gay males who are not going to fit into this study group, but in either case I'm making no judgements, loose or tight, we each live with our decisions.
That's right! And yes 'HIV' incidences are higher in economically repressed regions, and economically repressed demographics - (blacks/hispanics) because the diet of poor people is abysmal, their exposure to industrial pollution is higher (lets build this government project on tainted land shall we) and their overall mental well being is compromised due to their circumstances. Drug use is higher in impoverished communities and so is parental neglect leading to childhood malnutrition - because eating a pizza pop with a coke ain't no food.
Okay so now we know how to isolate (ostensibly) why hasn't it been done?
I don't really have much to say regarding this fungus, it's not necessary as far as I'm concerned. I also would tend to think that those who've 'cured' themselves of 'AIDS' through a Weston Price whole foods protocol wouldn't be too concerned about this fungus either.
I actually have no idea how I ended up at this strange little forum with no name. I was reading some stuff that linked to you and a guy 'code named' Sleeper. A hop skip and a jump later and I'm here.
And yes I'm very clearly pointing out that AIDS doesn't exist other than as a congregate of various diseases and symptoms that are the result of general immune deficiencies, the primary cause of which being MALNUTRITION.
If you were to step back and look at the landscape you'd see it too.
Close. I'm saying that is doesn't exist anywhere! Except for in the minds of the believers of course.
I'm not a shallow thinker John, I'm a keen observer, and I think you've missed the boat this time. I know you once missed a plane!? (Did I read that in the hologram 9-11 ATS thread? - which I agree with you about by the way).
No I'm sorry but Peter Duesberg is the man on the job here, I've read his Oncogenes, Aneuploidy and Aids and I'd say he has the facts quite familiarized.
No John, they threw it up because it was poison. Sure they were hungry, but poison isn't food, its poison.
Have you actually done ANY research on AIDS drugs? This is the genocide that has been planned, not some retrovirus that could backfire, but a drug and vaccine induced sickness that could be controlled with precision.
Yes Strecker, his whole premise is based on a false presumption. The very first 10 minutes of his not so compelling 'memorandum' he describes how the HIVirus appears under a microscope. He's working on second hand knowledge. HIV has never been seen. Comprehend this - HIV has NEVER been isolated, not under a distillation using your fungus and not any other way. NEVER BEEN ISOLATED.
No, he proved that something that has been called HIV, which he believed was a cross mutated retrovirus made in a lab could not have come from the Green Monkey. And I will state that it didn't come from the Black Bear or the White Swan either.
Yes, it is doing just fine, in the breeding grounds which are the WHO tents.
Strecker is a pretty big guy, he might be able to do some ripping and shredding but I'm far too agile for that. As far as his position on AIDS he's working from second hand knowledge, knowledge that was fixed from the outset by Gallo and associates. His presumptions are based on loose logic, not actual observation of isolated virus.
Yes watch the video, then look up Peter Duesberg and do some real research.
'HIV - AIDS' is like the War on Terror, its like the War on Drugs, its like the Federal Reserve, its like the story of Abraham Lincoln...
It's a hoax,
a badly done myth,
and it needs your belief to exist.
Cheers,
Angelo