|
Post by purduegrad05 on Aug 18, 2008 10:44:37 GMT -5
Hey John,
I had a couple quick questions to ask you about 9/11.
The first is about the Bureau of Transportation Statistics and flights 11 and 175. You said they can NOT be found on the BTS website or database and I was curious if you could point me to the part of their website so I can search for it myself?? I tried to find out where exactly to search but could not find it, any help would be great.
Also, if these flights are not there, never existed and all that....why wouldn't they just update the BTS website and their database so that the perps don't leave a trail?? I know, it's kind of too late now but if they didn't want to get caught one would think they would just adjust the database itself.
Lastly, has there been any progress on the Quitam complaint put forth by Dr. Morgan Reynolds?? What about Dr. Judy Wood's work?? What about all those military officers and their coming forward about 9/11?? One would think their opinion counts the most? Obviously the powers that be are not going to allow any of them to make much progress but I was just curious.
And how is that integrity thing going for ya?? Does 'Spot' still have your tin foil hat? If he does, just give him a Yoo-Hoo and he might give it back...probably with Yoo-Hoo stains on it!! ;D Cheers John!
Purduegrad05
|
|
|
Post by jca2008 on Aug 18, 2008 11:07:29 GMT -5
John,
I believe that this technology is out and has been out for a while. They government can now do almost whatever in the hell they want. They could fake the coming back of "Christ" for the believers if they want to. How could they fake an Alien Invasion and get away with it John? Seriously, if there were holographic aliens on earth right now, wouldn't you be able to put your hand through them since they aren't real? Or would humans be to afraid to even try?
|
|
|
Post by johnlear on Aug 18, 2008 12:04:35 GMT -5
Hey John, I had a couple quick questions to ask you about 9/11. The first is about the Bureau of Transportation Statistics and flights 11 and 175. You said they can NOT be found on the BTS website or database and I was curious if you could point me to the part of their website so I can search for it myself?? I tried to find out where exactly to search but could not find it, any help would be great. www.transtats.bts.gov/databases.asp?Mode_ID=1&Mode_Desc=Aviation&Subject_ID2=0 I don't know. The case was dismissed June 26, 2008 by New York District Court Judge George P. Daniels; he refused a Motion to Reconsider a few weeks later. She is appealing. We live in interesting times. Every day I wake up and think: I wonder what challenge life has prepared for me today? Whatever it is I will meet that challenge with integrity; and without envy, hate or greed. No problem with integrity. Its the hate thing. I don't actually hate anybody but I sure dislike a few so I am going to ask Sleeper when dislike is considered hate. In other words can I dislike someone just a little bit and not consider it hate? I mean I don't want to do anymore time on the planet than absolutely necessary so I don't want to actually 'hate' anybody. Not that I don't like it here. I do. Especially up at the mine. So I am going to ask sleeper, on a scale of one to ten, one being hate and ten being love what number can we still dislike between love an hate for it not to be counted against us. I mean can we dislike someone to number 6 without it being included in 'hate'? Or can we dislike to say, 2.5 before its counted against us? Now if sleeper says, no it's gotta be close to 10 for everybody then I have a problem. I sent them both a tin foil hat. Thats 2 free hats. Normal retail price is $20 each so that is $40 worth of merchandise. What do I get? Screwed in the poker games. Every single time.
|
|
|
Post by Lou on Aug 18, 2008 13:02:44 GMT -5
So I am going to ask sleeper, on a scale of one to ten, one being hate and ten being love what number can we still dislike between love an hate for it not to be counted against us. I mean can we dislike someone to number 6 without it being included in 'hate'? Or can we dislike to say, 2.5 before its counted against us? Hello John, hope your stay at the mine was a pleasant one If you keep it below 2.5, you will be ok but anything over that and you will have to come back as squirrel for a short time. Why a squirrel, I don't know, you tell me. True, but you keep coming back for more trouncing. Have you tried one of those gambling anonymous joints? There must be a bunch of them in Vegas
|
|
|
Post by purduegrad05 on Aug 18, 2008 13:07:35 GMT -5
Thanks for supplying that website John, I'll be checking it later on today. Well there's a shocker! Was there a reason for dismissing the case?? Will it be brought to a higher court?? Where do you go to keep up on this case information?? Since I've been reading Sleeper's stuff and taking all his info in, I've been doing the exact same thing. Seems like such a simple concept; integrity, no envy, hate or greed. But, I obviously haven't gotten it yet since I'm still here but I'm getting there...I think we all are one way or another. I've thought about that too John. I don't hate anyone really, it's too strong a word for someone because whatever wrong they did to us it is just a trivial matter. But I think everyone here, maybe even some higher ups, has some type of dislike that is directed at another soul but they don't take it much further than that. From what Sleeper has said in the past it would seem that even a little dislike or hate is unacceptable. However, he has said that when we move up a little in integrity and to better places we end up working on the "finer" integrity issues. So maybe there is a certain amount "allowed" here which goes to 0 as you move up. Hey Sleeper, can you comment on this? See John, you gotta stop playing that 7-2 in Hold'em because it's just not working for you....but it's certainly working for Milton and Sleeper ;D Oh yeah, I need one of those tin foil hats too. Maybe you could sell to other people. Just put an Armani logo on them and jack up the price. That way you'll make your money back from the free hats. Thanks for answering my questions John, and Sleeper. Purduegrad05
|
|
|
Post by johnlear on Aug 18, 2008 13:43:47 GMT -5
Thanks for supplying that website John, I'll be checking it later on today. Well there's a shocker! Was there a reason for dismissing the case?? It was a hodge podge. No. It is a civil case. nomoregames.net/Yeah well, just a word of caution: don't play any poker with Sleeper and Spot.
|
|
|
Post by johnlear on Aug 18, 2008 13:47:27 GMT -5
If you keep it below 2.5, you will be ok but anything over that and you will have to come back as squirrel for a short time. Why a squirrel, I don't know, you tell me. Its a nut issue Sleeper. I hang around too many of them.
|
|
|
Post by muse on Aug 18, 2008 15:22:17 GMT -5
"NUT ISSUE" Hillarious.........
|
|
|
Post by purduegrad05 on Aug 18, 2008 19:59:59 GMT -5
Hey John,
I know this question borders on ridiculous, but what would it take for the court to actually hearing the case and acknowledging the complaint?? I'm sure there are a number of pilots who could add some aviation expertise to the case without jeopardizing their careers. I'm probably wrong about that last one but you never know.
Thanks again John.
Purduegrad05
|
|
|
Post by lohiaaditya on Aug 20, 2008 10:55:15 GMT -5
Hi John,
I have been a great fan of yours. Amid everything I have asked you here and elsewhere I forgot the most important thing, I believe you have seen a UFO in real life at Area 51 right?
Good day. (btw, you are my favourite online theorist)
|
|
|
Post by johnlear on Aug 20, 2008 11:27:06 GMT -5
Hi John, I have been a great fan of yours. Amid everything I have asked you here and elsewhere I forgot the most important thing, I believe you have seen a UFO in real life at Area 51 right? Good day. (btw, you are my favourite online theorist) My friend Bob Lazar took us (me and Gene Huff and Bob's wife) out to Area 51 on March 22, 1989 to watch a test flight of one of the UFO's we got from the aliens. It came up from behind the mountains, swooped around, and descended back down. As it was settling down behind the mountains I got a good view through my Celestron 8. It looked like a flying saucer to me. The 20th anniversary of that episode will be next year and George Knapp has asked if I will join him in a review.
|
|
|
Post by patientman on Aug 20, 2008 13:59:15 GMT -5
Hi john I just saw your videos by project camelot on you tube, are there anymore interviews by those people in the future?
|
|
|
Post by johnlear on Aug 20, 2008 15:08:18 GMT -5
Hi john I just saw your videos by project camelot on you tube, are there anymore interviews by those people in the future? That was 4 hours of interviews. How many more hours do you want?
|
|
|
Post by tommyknockers on Aug 20, 2008 15:38:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by johnlear on Aug 20, 2008 16:23:19 GMT -5
Hi John. I picked this up from a site that will rename nameless. Have you seen these yet? Yeah, I think they are from Keith Laney's site.
|
|