|
Post by Lou on Jan 9, 2010 9:46:22 GMT -5
Hi Lou, Thanks for the quick reply. I guess the only questions left to ask are, Is there anything we can possibly do when having sex that is considered wrong? Anything at all? Certainly there are and most should know where that line is. Right or wrong, many think that way anyway. That's part of the integrity trap. Integrity doesn't stop in the sex department. Find someone to love and stick with them. Sex is not a sin, what we do with sex might be. Freewill applies. Somethings we have to work out on our own, no freebies. Ego and selfishness.
|
|
|
Post by Lou on Jan 9, 2010 10:28:40 GMT -5
Lou, Hello been a while, but You couldn't have said it best. I don't think humans will ever actually understand sex. It's just weird how humans are warped into believing sex is a sin or blasphemy. I agree that sex is not a sin, but I also believe it should only be shared with someone whom you love. If you are married or in a relationship it would be greedy of yourself to find another woman on the side even if you were in a situation that you felt you weren't getting enough sex from that person. Hi jc, As you said sex is something humans will never understand. We only have a sliver of it while down here on earth and it makes most of us goofy! lol Prostitution has always been part of the human equation on war planets, and always will be. Maintain that attitude and utopia is the next step. For the most part we come into the world alone and we all have different destinations when we leave. Wise old and young don't need to follow the crowd to know where they are going. Wisdom is available to all who wish to live by its dictates. The gift of life is explained on a higher level, but we are part of a never ending fantastic existence that only few on this level are allowed to comprehend. What is the purpose of a fragrant flower, a winter wonderland, a warm summer breeze, the color of autumn, friendship and love. To bring joy into the universe, that is the purpose of humans. Suffering is a state of mind/soul, a mind/soul that is off track.
|
|
|
Post by Lou on Jan 10, 2010 10:47:47 GMT -5
Ok I think I get it. I was raised in somewhat of a religious home so most of what Lou is stating here is about the same thing I've been previously taught. I was always told there is nothing sinful or wrong with sex if it's with the right person and the one you love and plan to be with the rest of your life. Find a good lady to be with and never look back. Do not cheat on the one you love and keep it a good solid relationship. Treat your wife exactly the way you would want her to treat you. Cherish the love so to speak and make her happy. Show respect to the one you love through a mutually decided upon sexual relationship. That's a good start No
|
|
|
Post by Izarith on Jan 11, 2010 4:02:13 GMT -5
Hello Sleeper, I can understand how there is no such thing as monogamy in the soul world. I will admit that the idea really does not sit right with me, I'm kind of a jealous guy. But what I don't get is why you came to Earth. As far as your blog goes you came to earth for Neptini so you two could go in the same direction after Earth right? I don't mean to butt into your love life or any disrespect, I'm sure she is very special to you but I think there is some one very special to me too out there and was wondering if you could explain your relationship with Neptini and why coming to Earth was so important. Where are you two headed, and why was Earth necessary for going to that place? Neptini came to earth to help a friend, I assume to become her daughter. How would becoming her soul Friend's daughter help her friend? Was your reasons for coming to earth meant to help Neptini? You said you have met her briefly on earth once. Did she know who you were? You sounded a bit sad and tight lipped when you posted this response. Can you tell us a bit about your meeting with her? Do you miss her? Is she still alive here on earth as a human? Thanks Sleeper, If you don't want to talk about some of this no need to. It would help me out tho.
|
|
|
Post by Lou on Jan 11, 2010 11:01:48 GMT -5
Hello Sleeper, I can understand how there is no such thing as monogamy in the soul world. I will admit that the idea really does not sit right with me, I'm kind of a jealous guy. Hello izz, There is no room for jealousy in the big picture. Such crutches are lower level stuff that most of us are hindered with down here. It's normal but dangerous to the soul, Cain and Able being good examples of jealousy gone wrong toward their god. Kind of like what is going on right now with the Jews, Christians, and Moslems, all vying for the love of the same god. The story is much deeper than what I wrote in that book, and much more complicated than puppy love. Code words Souls that come into our lives do so for specific reasons. But simply having a loving child come into the life of someone spiraling out of control has changed some people's directions for the better. I'm here to do my 0.2
|
|
|
Post by kohi77 on Jan 11, 2010 11:59:14 GMT -5
I had some questions about such things last week when this thread started, the same day! Wow. I had been telling some people to let things hidden in the past remain there in plain sight as reminders that you can start things up from that moment forward to do good things. Then I realised I cannot see what things vex me in my own life, blockages! Sometimes I get answers and sometimes little things to trip over, or not.
|
|
|
Post by frami12 on Jan 11, 2010 20:41:11 GMT -5
Thank's Lou for such a Great Information!
Most of us with Christian religious background are suffering because of that.
Do we have the same approach to sexuality?
Are there levels of sensitivity? Is it programmed in our machines, I mean less medium, high level?
Frami
|
|
|
Post by Izarith on Jan 12, 2010 6:25:56 GMT -5
Hello izz, There is no room for jealousy in the big picture. Such crutches are lower level stuff that most of us are hindered with down here. It's normal but dangerous to the soul, Cain and Able being good examples of jealousy gone wrong toward their god. Kind of like what is going on right now with the Jews, Christians, and Moslems, all vying for the love of the same god. Call me crazy but I think I truly understand what your saying. I guess being grateful of the other person is what love is. Not wanting her for yourself. Is any bond between a man and a woman on Earth not puppy love? Or are you just calling me naive. Integrity? no wait...Hate, envy and ego? A bear in a dress? Rumpelstiltskin? Friend in Elvish? I'm kidding Sleeper, I'm going to assume you said code words for a reason. Lets see, are you trying to say that by coming to Earth and getting your metal tested and passing you are meaforicly given the word to ascend to the next adventure? Well I'm grateful for all the souls and children that have come into my life and I can only hope my coming into this world has helped. What about abductions? For example if a person fathered a child in an abduction, would the little pup know about the father? I'm not talking about a kid meant for Earth, I mean a child meant for possibly an other outer worldly life. Is there a strong soul bond between parents and the children they helped make during abductions? Thanks Sleeper.
|
|
|
Post by Lou on Jan 12, 2010 9:29:59 GMT -5
Can you explain this Lou? On the other side when moving up there is no lack of love, no insecurity, no depression, no complicated issues to deal with, and no monogamy, everyone loves each other. In a place of abundance there is no need to share, everyone receives what they desire in the category they are at/deserve. Physical love is clouded with emotions. No If we choose And or
|
|
|
Post by Lou on Jan 12, 2010 9:39:42 GMT -5
Thank's Lou for such a Great Information! Most of us with Christian religious background are suffering because of that. Do we have the same approach to sexuality? Sexuality is not a human creation it is part of what we are. Some people have more need for it than others, depends on the body/mind they were placed into. Many levels of sensitivity, some people get more pleasure/desire some get little or none.
|
|
|
Post by Lou on Jan 12, 2010 9:58:08 GMT -5
I guess being grateful of the other person is what love is. Not wanting her for yourself. Yeah right ;D Down here when we fall in love with someone we have no intention of sharing that person with others. That's what monogamy is about and why it was instilled in us. We all are jealous of our possessions and that's fine "to a point" on these lower levels. Most people would settle for puppy love. You naive, I don't think so. That pup would not know in most situations. We are talking body seeds. We don't own our bodies or the seeds and eggs that bodies produce. In some situations.
|
|
|
Post by noface on Jan 12, 2010 16:21:33 GMT -5
Hi Lou,
I don't know where it was, but recently I thought I read where you said that domination was a perversion of sorts. Yet, it seems to me that this is what most women look for in a sexual partner. Does that mean that women are perverted and basically perpetuating that perversion by insisting that the men they choose for sexual partners be dominant in some way?
|
|
|
Post by Izarith on Jan 13, 2010 5:57:15 GMT -5
Ah come on. I've been there and done that. There is not a single possession that has not been stripped from me in my life at some point. I might be a jealous man but it's never been much use. The whole Idea about monogamy is that jealousy is not required nor is monogamy an option or a choice. Your either monogamous with someone or your just doing the right thing. Hell loving every one with out question in the soul world is as monogamous as it gets. Plus loving some one enough to just be glad they exist in your life some how is as good as it gets some times. Most people settle for a couple of drinks. I'm not naive enough to fall for that line Sleeper. Always a catch. Best news I've heard in a while. ;D Thanks Sleeper.
|
|
|
Post by Starlight on Jan 13, 2010 7:24:16 GMT -5
Hi Lou, I don't know where it was, but recently I thought I read where you said that domination was a perversion of sorts. Yet, it seems to me that this is what most women look for in a sexual partner. Does that mean that women are perverted and basically perpetuating that perversion by insisting that the men they choose for sexual partners be dominant in some way? Now, now Noface. No need for that. There are "some" ladies on this board. I always enjoy reading your posts and your post on page 1 on the "one hand clap" sure gave me a giggle. Yes I have pondered on this often as well....... But the above post is a little below the belt. I agree that there are women who perpetuate the sort of cave man type of ideal but I feel there is just as many women who may be a little more wise and hope to find an honest & kind soul with integrity that just happens to be in a mans body. I think that maybe the domination thing gets all mixed up with a sign of strength. Whereas we "all" here on this board realise integrity is the greatest strength of all. Anyways I thought we was just playing up to men's need to dominate to keep you'all happy, so all hell don't break loose. Just play'n ya! Lou?? Great to see you posting again too, Lou. Stella
|
|
|
Post by Azrael on Jan 13, 2010 8:49:56 GMT -5
As somebody who has been with women who like it "dominant wild and rough (no hurting)" I would say its not perverted at all lol the whole point of the thread was that sex isnt sinful if 2 people who care about each other want to have some wild fun in the bedroom more power to them. Sex is for our enjoyment so there is no need to be a prude about it I believe that was the gist of the Original Post by Lou.
|
|